2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1982 Volvo 240
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 260 kg more than 1982 Volvo 240.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 240. (167 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Wrangler | 1982 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Jeep | Volvo |
| Model | Wrangler | 240 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
| Torque | 296 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.4 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.7 mm | 80 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2660 mm |
