2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,777 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (128 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (121 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 840 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (410 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 1993 Rover 200 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Wrangler | 200 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2777 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 121 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2510 mm |