2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1995 Opel Omega
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 145 kg more than 1995 Opel Omega.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Opel Omega. (185 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 1995 Opel Omega | |
Make | Jeep | Opel |
Model | Wrangler | Omega |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2740 mm |