2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (216 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Wrangler. (172 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (311 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Wrangler | CLK |
Year Released | 2008 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3979 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 216 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 311 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |