2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1999 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 226 kg more than 1999 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (297 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mercury Cougar. (223 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mercury Cougar.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 1999 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | Wrangler | Cougar |
Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2530 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Torque | 297 Nm | 223 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.5 mm | 82.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.7 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1344 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 58 L |