2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (172 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2002 Mercedes-Benz C. (141 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2002 Mercedes-Benz C.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mercedes-Benz C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mercedes-Benz C. (220 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 2002 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Wrangler | C |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3979 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 85 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.6 seconds | 10.2 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |