2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 840 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (297 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Jeep | MCC |
Model | Wrangler | Smart |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 297 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2370 mm |