2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+ would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (172 HP) has 97 more horse power than 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+. (75 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+. (117 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+ | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Wrangler | Wagon R+ |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3979 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 75 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 117 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 41 L |