2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP) has 132 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1120 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Jeep Wrangler 2004 MCC Crossblade
Make Jeep MCC
Model Wrangler Crossblade
Year Released 2008 2004
Engine Size 3778 cc 599 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 202 HP 70 HP
Torque 321 Nm 102 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3210 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1860 kg 740 kg
Vehicle Length 4410 mm 2630 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1810 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 1810 mm