2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Wrangler. (172 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (339 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Wrangler | Endeavor |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3979 cc | 3835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 81 L |