2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 80 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (296 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Wrangler | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Wrangler | Outlander |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2374 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 296 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.4 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.7 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 59 L |
