2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2005 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan 350Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan 350Z would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan 350Z (300 HP) has 128 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Wrangler. (172 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Nissan 350Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan 350Z (372 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Wrangler | 2005 Nissan 350Z | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Wrangler | 350Z |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3979 cc | 3491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 300 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 81 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1320 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.3 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 76 L |
