2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 125 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (297 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (220 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Wrangler | 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | Wrangler | Grand Vitara |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 297 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.5 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.7 mm | 75 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4180 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 64 L |
