2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (172 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Camry. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Toyota Camry. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Camry. (217 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Wrangler | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | Wrangler | Camry |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3979 cc | 2358 cc |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 88.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 96 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1500 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.3 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |
