2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2007 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Suzuki Alto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Suzuki Alto would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (172 HP) has 110 more horse power than 2007 Suzuki Alto. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2007 Suzuki Alto.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Suzuki Alto. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Suzuki Alto. (85 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 2007 Suzuki Alto | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Wrangler | Alto |
Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3979 cc | 1061 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 62 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 85 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.6 seconds | 14.8 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1460 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.3 L/100km | 4.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 35 L |