2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (222 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Wrangler. (172 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ford E-Series. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (387 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
Make | Jeep | Ford |
Model | Wrangler | E-Series |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3979 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 222 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 387 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 2085 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 150 L |