2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 491 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Jeep | Mini |
Model | Wrangler | Countryman |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 321 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1949 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.5 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 47 L |