2008 Kia Carnival vs. 1975 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2008 Kia Carnival is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,272 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Kia Carnival weights approximately 558 kg more than 1975 Mercury Comet.
Because 1975 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Kia Carnival, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Kia Carnival (224 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mercury Comet. (197 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Kia Carnival will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mercury Comet.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Kia Carnival | 1975 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Kia | Mercury |
Model | Carnival | Comet |
Year Released | 2008 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3272 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 224 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1988 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2800 mm |