2008 Kia Carnival vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2008 Kia Carnival is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Kia Carnival is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Kia Carnival (224 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2008 Kia Carnival will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 2008 Kia Carnival has manual transmission. 2008 Kia Carnival will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Kia Carnival | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Carnival | FTO |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1300 mm |
