2008 Kia Carnival vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2008 Kia Carnival is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Kia Carnival weights approximately 368 kg more than 2003 Cadillac CTS.

Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Kia Carnival, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Kia Carnival. (224 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Kia Carnival.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Kia Carnival 2003 Cadillac CTS
Make Kia Cadillac
Model Carnival CTS
Year Released 2008 2003
Body Type Minivan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2497 cc 2597 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 179 HP
Torque 224 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 83.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82.8 mm 79.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.4:1 10.2:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1988 kg 1620 kg
Vehicle Length 4550 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2910 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 64 L