2008 Kia Carnival vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2008 Kia Carnival is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 286 kg more than 2008 Kia Carnival.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Kia Carnival. (224 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Kia Carnival.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Kia Carnival | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Kia | Nissan |
| Model | Carnival | Armada |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2496 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 98.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1988 kg | 2274 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 106 L |
