2008 Kia Carnival vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2008 Kia Carnival is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Kia Carnival weights approximately 351 kg more than 2004 Subaru Outback.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Kia Carnival. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Subaru Outback (285 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Kia Carnival. (224 Nm). This means 2004 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Kia Carnival.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Kia Carnival | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Kia | Subaru |
Model | Carnival | Outback |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 213 HP |
Torque | 224 Nm | 285 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 10.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1988 kg | 1637 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |