2008 Kia Cerato vs. 1980 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 2008 Kia Cerato is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Lotus Eclat (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2008 Kia Cerato. (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Lotus Eclat should accelerate faster than 2008 Kia Cerato. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Kia Cerato weights approximately 289 kg more than 1980 Lotus Eclat.
Because 1980 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Kia Cerato, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Lotus Eclat (217 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Kia Cerato. (186 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1980 Lotus Eclat will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Kia Cerato.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Kia Cerato | 1980 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Kia | Lotus |
Model | Cerato | Eclat |
Year Released | 2008 | 1980 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 2174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.4:1 |
Top Speed | 203 km/hour | 212 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9 seconds | 8.3 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 67 L |