2008 Kia Cerato vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Kia Cerato. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Kia Cerato would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Kia Cerato is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Kia Cerato (110 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Kia Cerato should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Kia Cerato weights approximately 724 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Kia Cerato, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Kia Cerato (146 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Kia Cerato will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano. 2008 Kia Cerato has automatic transmission and 2012 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2012 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Kia Cerato will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Kia Cerato | 2012 Tata Nano | |
Make | Kia | Tata |
Model | Cerato | Nano |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 166 km/hour | 105 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1324 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 37 L |