2008 Kia Picanto vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Kia Picanto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Kia Picanto would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Kia Picanto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 401 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Kia Picanto. (99 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Kia Picanto.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Kia Picanto | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Kia | Jaguar |
Model | Picanto | XF |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1086 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 99 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 17.9 seconds | 6.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 70 L |