2008 Kia Pro-ceed vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Kia Pro-ceed is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Kia Pro-ceed (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Kia Pro-ceed should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Kia Pro-ceed weights approximately 92 kg more than 1974 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Kia Pro-ceed (186 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2008 Kia Pro-ceed will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Kia Pro-ceed | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Kia | Triumph |
| Model | Pro-ceed | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1975 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1337 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |
