2008 Kia Pro-ceed vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2008 Kia Pro-ceed is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2008 Kia Pro-ceed. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 2008 Kia Pro-ceed. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 122 kg more than 2008 Kia Pro-ceed. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Kia Pro-ceed (255 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Frontier. (209 Nm). This means 2008 Kia Pro-ceed will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Frontier.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Kia Pro-ceed | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
| Make | Kia | Nissan |
| Model | Pro-ceed | Frontier |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1580 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 255 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 77.2 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.5 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1358 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 60 L |
