2008 Kia Pro-ceed vs. 2006 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2008 Kia Pro-ceed is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Bluebird (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2008 Kia Pro-ceed. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 2008 Kia Pro-ceed.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Kia Pro-ceed (255 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Bluebird. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Kia Pro-ceed will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Kia Pro-ceed | 2006 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Pro-ceed | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.2 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |