2008 Kia Rio vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Kia Rio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1339 kg more than 2008 Kia Rio.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Kia Rio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Kia Rio. (125 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Kia Rio | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Kia | Land Rover |
Model | Rio | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1399 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1101 kg | 2440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.6 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 100 L |