2008 Kia Rio vs. 2004 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2008 Kia Rio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Titan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Titan would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Titan weights approximately 1297 kg more than 2008 Kia Rio.
Because 2004 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Kia Rio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 389 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Kia Rio. (125 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Kia Rio | 2004 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Rio | Titan |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1399 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 514 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1101 kg | 2398 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 106 L |