2008 Kia Sedona vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2008 Kia Sedona is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,902 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Kia Sedona (142 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 1964 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Kia Sedona | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Kia | Lotus |
| Model | Sedona | Elan |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2902 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 45 L |
