2008 Kia Shuma vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2008 Kia Shuma is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Kia Shuma (112 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Kia Shuma should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 139 kg more than 2008 Kia Shuma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Kia Shuma. (157 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Kia Shuma. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 2008 Kia Shuma has manual transmission. 2008 Kia Shuma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Kia Shuma | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Shuma | CU-X |
Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 80 L |