2008 Kia Shuma vs. 2003 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2008 Kia Shuma is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan Cima weights approximately 600 kg more than 2008 Kia Shuma.
Because 2003 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Kia Shuma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Kia Shuma | 2003 Nissan Cima | |
| Make | Kia | Nissan |
| Model | Shuma | Cima |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 4500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1500 mm |
