2008 Lada 21 vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Lada 21 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (93 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2008 Lada 21. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2008 Lada 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Lada 21 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (142 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Lada 21. (121 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Lada 21.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Lada 21 | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lada | Renault |
Model | 21 | Clio |
Year Released | 2008 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 93 HP |
Torque | 121 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 43 L |