2008 Lancia Musa vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Lancia Musa is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2008 Lancia Musa. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2008 Lancia Musa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Lancia Musa weights approximately 66 kg more than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Lancia Musa (260 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Lancia Musa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Lancia Musa | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Lancia | Nissan |
Model | Musa | Cedric |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |