2008 Land Rover Defender vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Defender is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,495 cc, 2008 Land Rover Defender is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Defender weights approximately 1029 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Because 2008 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Triumph Herald. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Defender (301 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (85 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Defender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Land Rover Defender | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Land Rover | Triumph |
| Model | Defender | Herald |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1147 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 50 HP |
| Torque | 301 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 69.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 76 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 841 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2330 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 29 L |
