2008 Land Rover Discovery vs. 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,223 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Discovery weights approximately 723 kg more than 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud.
Because 2008 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Discovery | 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | Land Rover | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Discovery | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4394 cc | 6223 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 91.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2704 kg | 1981 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 81 L |