2008 Land Rover Discovery vs. 1979 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Discovery is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Discovery weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-7.
Because 2008 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Discovery (341 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Discovery will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Discovery | 1979 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Discovery | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1979 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 341 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2175 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 65 L |