2008 Land Rover Discovery vs. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 31 kg more than 2008 Land Rover Discovery.
Because 2008 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Discovery | 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Land Rover | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Discovery | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2008 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 6749 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2175 kg | 2206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.7 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 107 L |