2008 Land Rover Discovery vs. 1982 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 2,494 cc, 2008 Land Rover Discovery is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Discovery weights approximately 1250 kg more than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Because 2008 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mercury Lynx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Discovery (300 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Discovery will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Discovery | 1982 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Land Rover | Mercury |
Model | Discovery | Lynx |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 43 L |