2008 Land Rover Discovery vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,495 cc, 2008 Land Rover Discovery is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Discovery (300 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda RX-7. (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Discovery will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Discovery | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Discovery | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1986 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 2354 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Top Speed | 152 km/hour | 230 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2430 mm |