2008 Land Rover Discovery vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Discovery is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Discovery weights approximately 1386 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Because 2008 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Discovery (360 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Discovery will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Discovery | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Discovery | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2614 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 360 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2486 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 65 L |