2008 Land Rover Discovery vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 3,950 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Discovery is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Discovery weights approximately 759 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Because 2008 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Discovery (340 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MPV. (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Discovery will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Discovery | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Discovery | MPV |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 340 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2175 kg | 1416 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 75 L |