2008 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 840 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Freelander (401 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Freelander | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Freelander | Cedric |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2179 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 401 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2540 mm |