2008 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1964 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2008 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Freelander (230 HP) has 177 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 786 kg more than 1964 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2008 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Zastava 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Freelander (317 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Zastava 1500. 2008 Land Rover Freelander has automatic transmission and 1964 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1964 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Land Rover Freelander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: