2008 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,178 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 885 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2008 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Riley Kestrel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Freelander (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Freelander | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Land Rover | Riley |
Model | Freelander | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 2178 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 25 L |