2008 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 480 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Freelander (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Land Rover Freelander | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
| Model | Freelander | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2179 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
