2008 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1976 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,178 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 414 kg more than 1976 Nissan Cedric.
Because 2008 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Freelander (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Freelander | 1976 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Freelander | Cedric |
Year Released | 2008 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2178 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1356 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |