2008 Land Rover Freelander vs. 2000 Suzuki XL6
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Suzuki XL6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Suzuki XL6 would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 325 kg more than 2000 Suzuki XL6.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Freelander (317 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Suzuki XL6. (218 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Suzuki XL6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Freelander | 2000 Suzuki XL6 | |
Make | Land Rover | Suzuki |
Model | Freelander | XL6 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3192 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 317 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2490 mm |