2008 Land Rover Freelander vs. 2005 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 287 kg more than 2005 Mazda B3000.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Freelander (400 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B3000. (240 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Land Rover Freelander | 2005 Mazda B3000 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
| Model | Freelander | B3000 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2178 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 16.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1483 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 62 L |
